Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Sigma sd Quattro H Specs |
|
|
GFX 50R
All specs: Main page for GFX 50R |
sd Quattro H
All specs: Main page for sd Quattro H |
|
GFX 50R vs sd Quattro H Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Better choice: Fujifilm GFX 50R |
|
GFX 50R vs sd Quattro H: Viewfinder GFX 50R has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 3.69 megapixel with magnification of 0.77x. sd Quattro H has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.69x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
GFX 50R (0.77x) |
sd Quattro H (0.69x) |
|
|
Note: Differences in the image area are the result of different image ratios, 3:2 or 4:3. That can make it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras. |
||
|
Fujifilm GFX 50R VS Sigma sd Quattro H Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Fujifilm GFX 50R a better choice |
||
|
GFX 50R |
sd Quattro H |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Medium format | APS-C H |
| Sensor cleaning (3) | ||
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 51.40 | 44.80 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 117 | 9 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 12800 ISO | 100 – 6400 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 3.69 | 2.36 |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 5 | |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 1.62 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 1920 x 1080 | 0 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 400 | 300 |
| More portable (2) | 1030cm³ (65 cu.in.) |
1269cm³ (80 cu.in.) |
| WiFi (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the GFX 50R are the larger sensor, built-in automatic sensor cleaning and the higher resolution. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the larger sensitivity and the better viewfinder. We also like the larger selection of lenses, that the display has a higher resolution and the articulated display. A recommendation of the GFX 50R is made easy by the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone. Another advantage over the sd Quattro H: that the battery has more stamina, the more compact size and the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. The GFX 50R scores 45 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sigma sd Quattro H |
||
|
GFX 50R |
sd Quattro H |
|
| Weighs less (2) | 775g (25.0 oz.) |
649g (20.9 oz.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the sd Quattro H are the lower weight than the GFX 50R. Yields 2 points for the sd Quattro H. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
GFX 50R |
sd Quattro H |
|
| Speed (frames/second) | 3 | 3 |
| Fujifilm GFX 50R VS Sigma sd Quattro H Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the GFX 50R and sd Quattro H |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Fujifilm GFX 50R |
Sigma sd Quattro H |
|
45
|
2
|
|
We recommend Fujifilm GFX 50R as better choice. |
|