Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Sony Cyber-shot H400 Specs |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot H400
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot H400 |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot H400: The sensors |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the Cyber-shot H400 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC FZ1000 II is a lot larger than the Cyber-shot H400’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot H400: Viewfinder DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.74x. The Cyber-shot H400 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 0.40 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.50x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
Cyber-shot H400 (0.50x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot H400 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot H400 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 12 | 1 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 1 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 125 – 12800 ISO | 80 – 3200 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 0.40 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.24 | 0.46 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 1280 x 720 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 440 | 300 |
| WiFi (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the articulated display, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the connector for an external microphone, that the battery has more stamina and the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. The DMC FZ1000 II scores 36 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot H400 |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot H400 |
|
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 20.40 |
| Weighs less (2) | 810g (26.1 oz.) |
655g (21.1 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
1506cm³ (95 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot H400 are the higher resolution, the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size. Yields 9 points for the Cyber-shot H400. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot H400 |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot H400 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and Cyber-shot H400 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
Sony Cyber-shot H400 |
|
36
|
9
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|