Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Panasonic DMC FZ300 Specs |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
DMC FZ300
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ300 |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs DMC FZ300: The sensors |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the DMC FZ300 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC FZ1000 II is a lot larger than the DMC FZ300’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs DMC FZ300: Viewfinder DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.74x. The DMC FZ300 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 1.44 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.70x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
DMC FZ300 (0.70x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Panasonic DMC FZ300 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
DMC FZ300 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 12.00 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 125 – 12800 ISO | 100 – 6400 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 1.44 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.24 | 1.04 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 440 | 380 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the larger sensitivity. We also like the better viewfinder, that the display has a higher resolution and that the battery has more stamina. The DMC FZ1000 II scores 23 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ300 |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
DMC FZ300 |
|
| Weighs less (2) | 810g (26.1 oz.) |
691g (22.3 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
1410cm³ (89 cu.in.) |
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ300 are the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II, the more compact size. Yields 4 points for the DMC FZ300. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
DMC FZ300 |
|
| Speed (frames/second) | 12 | 12 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Video resolution | 4096 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Panasonic DMC FZ300 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and DMC FZ300 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
Panasonic DMC FZ300 |
|
23
|
4
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|
