Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Sony Cyber-shot WX350 Compare

Posted on by

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot WX350 - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Sony Cyber-shot WX350 Specs

DMC FZ1000 II

  • Introduced in February 2019
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1″
  • 20 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 125 – 12800 ISO
  • 4096 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 24-400mm (17x), f2.8-4.0
  • WiFi built-in
  • 136 x 97.2 x 131.5mm³ (5.4″ x 3.8″ x 5.2″)
  • 810g (26.1 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II

Cyber-shot WX350

  • Introduced in February 2014
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 18 megapixel
  • 10 frames/second
  • 100 – 12800 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor
  • Zoom 24-480mm (20x), f3.5-6.5
  • WiFi built-in
  • 96 x 54.9 x 25.7mm³ (3.8″ x 2.2″ x 1.0″)
  • 137g (4.4 oz.)

All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot WX350

DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot WX350: The sensors

The DMC FZ1000 II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the Cyber-shot WX350 uses a Compact sensor.

Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC FZ1000 II is a lot larger than the Cyber-shot WX350’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format.

Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II

Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot WX350 Other Specs Comparison

Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice

DMC FZ1000 II

Cyber-shot WX350
Larger sensor (5)

1″ Compact
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)

20.10 18.20
Higher speed (4, frames/second)

12 10
Auto Focus points (4)

49 1
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)

1.24 0.46
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)

4096 x 2160 1920 x 1080
External microphone (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, that the display has a higher resolution and the articulated display. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone.

The DMC FZ1000 II scores 28 points.

Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot WX350

DMC FZ1000 II

Cyber-shot WX350
Better sensibility (4)

125 – 12800 ISO 100 – 12800 ISO
Longer battery life (3, photos)

440 470
Weighs less (2)

810g
(26.1 oz.)		 137g
(4.4 oz.)
More portable (2)

1738cm³
(110 cu.in.)		 135cm³
(9 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot WX350 are the larger sensitivity, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II. Another advantage over the DMC FZ1000 II: the more compact size.

Yields 11 points for the Cyber-shot WX350.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

DMC FZ1000 II

Cyber-shot WX350
Built-in flash
Image stabilizer
WiFi
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot WX350 Dimensions

Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and Cyber-shot WX350

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II

Sony Cyber-shot WX350

28
11

We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice.