Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon EOS M50 vs Fujifilm X-H1 Specs |
|
|
EOS M50
All specs: Main page for EOS M50 |
X-H1
All specs: Main page for X-H1 |
|
EOS M50 vs X-H1 Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:
|
|
EOS M50 vs X-H1: Viewfinder EOS M50 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.60x. X-H1 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 3.69 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.75x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
EOS M50 (0.60x) |
X-H1 (0.75x) |
|
|
Better choice: Fujifilm X-H1 |
||
|
Canon EOS M50 VS Fujifilm X-H1 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon EOS M50 a better choice |
||
|
EOS M50 |
X-H1 |
|
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 25600 ISO | 200 – 12800 ISO |
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Weighs less (2) | 387g (12.5 oz.) |
673g (21.7 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 601cm³ (38 cu.in.) |
1163cm³ (73 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the EOS M50 are the larger sensitivity, the built-in flash and the lower weight than the X-H1. Another advantage over the X-H1: the more compact size. The EOS M50 scores 10 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Fujifilm X-H1 |
||
|
EOS M50 |
X-H1 |
|
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 24.10 | 24.30 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 14 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 143 | 325 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 3.69 |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 7 | 25 |
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 235 | 310 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the X-H1 are the higher resolution, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the better viewfinder, the larger selection of lenses and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is the superior video recording, that the battery has more stamina and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. Yields 30 points for the X-H1. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
EOS M50 |
X-H1 |
|
| Sensor format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Sensor resolution (MP) | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Canon EOS M50 VS Fujifilm X-H1 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the EOS M50 and X-H1 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon EOS M50 |
Fujifilm X-H1 |
|
10
|
30
|
|
We recommend Fujifilm X-H1 as better choice. |
|