Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P610 vs Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Specs |
|
|
Coolpix P610
All specs: Main page for Coolpix P610 |
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
|
Coolpix P610 vs DMC FZ1000 II: The sensors |
|
|
Coolpix P610 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ1000 II uses a 1″ sensor. Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ1000 II’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Coolpix P610 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
Coolpix P610 vs DMC FZ1000 II: Viewfinder Coolpix P610 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 0.92 megapixel with magnification of 0.50x. The DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
Coolpix P610 (0.50x) |
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Nikon Coolpix P610 VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Nikon Coolpix P610 a better choice |
||
|
Coolpix P610 |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Weighs less (2) | 565g (18.2 oz.) |
810g (26.1 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1132cm³ (71 cu.in.) |
1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
| GPS (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Coolpix P610 are the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II, the more compact size and the built-in GPS. The Coolpix P610 scores 6 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Coolpix P610 |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Compact | 1″ |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 16.00 | 20.10 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 7 | 12 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 1 | 49 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 6400 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 1.24 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 1920 x 1080 | 4096 x 2160 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 360 | 440 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the larger sensitivity and the better viewfinder. We also like that the display has a higher resolution, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina. Yields 37 points for the DMC FZ1000 II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
Coolpix P610 |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Nikon Coolpix P610 VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the Coolpix P610 and DMC FZ1000 II |
|
 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
 |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P610 |
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
6
|
37
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|