Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II Specs |
|
|
GFX 50R
All specs: Main page for GFX 50R |
OM-D E-M10 Mark II
All specs: Main page for OM-D E-M10 Mark II |
|
GFX 50R vs OM-D E-M10 Mark II Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Better choice: Fujifilm GFX 50R |
|
GFX 50R vs OM-D E-M10 Mark II: Viewfinder GFX 50R has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 3.69 megapixel with magnification of 0.77x. OM-D E-M10 Mark II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.61x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
GFX 50R (0.77x) |
OM-D E-M10 Mark II (0.61x) |
|
|
Advantage: Fujifilm GFX 50R |
||
|
Fujifilm GFX 50R VS Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Fujifilm GFX 50R a better choice |
||
|
GFX 50R |
OM-D E-M10 Mark II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 51.40 | 16.10 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 117 | 81 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 3.69 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 1.04 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 400 | 320 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the GFX 50R are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the better viewfinder, that the display has a higher resolution and the connector for an external microphone. Another advantage over the OM-D E-M10 Mark II: that the battery has more stamina and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. The GFX 50R scores 27 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II |
||
|
GFX 50R |
OM-D E-M10 Mark II |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 3 | 8 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 12800 ISO | 100 – 25600 ISO |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 5 | 80 |
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Weighs less (2) | 775g (25.0 oz.) |
390g (12.6 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1030cm³ (65 cu.in.) |
464cm³ (29 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the OM-D E-M10 Mark II are that the camera is faster, the larger sensitivity and the larger selection of lenses. We also like the built-in flash, the optical image stabilizer and the lower weight than the GFX 50R. Another advantage over the GFX 50R: the more compact size. Yields 20 points for the OM-D E-M10 Mark II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
GFX 50R |
OM-D E-M10 Mark II |
|
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Video resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| WiFi | ||
| Fujifilm GFX 50R VS Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the GFX 50R and OM-D E-M10 Mark II |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Fujifilm GFX 50R |
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II |
|
27
|
20
|
|
We recommend Fujifilm GFX 50R as better choice. |
|