Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 vs Sony Cyber-shot HX95 Specs |
|
|
DMC TZ101
All specs: Main page for DMC TZ101 |
Cyber-shot HX95
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot HX95 |
|
DMC TZ101 vs Cyber-shot HX95: The sensors |
|
|
DMC TZ101 features a 1″ sized sensor, while the Cyber-shot HX95 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC TZ101 is a lot larger than the Cyber-shot HX95’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC TZ101 |
|
DMC TZ101 vs Cyber-shot HX95: Viewfinder DMC TZ101 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 1.16 megapixel with magnification of 0.46x. The Cyber-shot HX95 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 0.64 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.50x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC TZ101 (0.46x) |
Cyber-shot HX95 (0.50x) |
|
|
Advantage: Sony Cyber-shot HX95 |
||
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 VS Sony Cyber-shot HX95 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC TZ101 a better choice |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
Cyber-shot HX95 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 18.20 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 1 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 25600 ISO | 80 – 12800 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 1.16 | 0.64 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 0.92 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC TZ101 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the rather comfortable touch screen. The DMC TZ101 scores 26 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot HX95 |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
Cyber-shot HX95 |
|
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 320 | 390 |
| Weighs less (2) | 310g (10.0 oz.) |
243g (7.8 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 317cm³ (20 cu.in.) |
210cm³ (13 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot HX95 are the articulated display, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the DMC TZ101. Another advantage over the DMC TZ101: the more compact size. Yields 9 points for the Cyber-shot HX95. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
Cyber-shot HX95 |
|
| Speed (frames/second) | 10 | 10 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Video resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| WiFi | ||
| Panasonic DMC TZ101 VS Sony Cyber-shot HX95 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC TZ101 and Cyber-shot HX95 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 |
Sony Cyber-shot HX95 |
|
26
|
9
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC TZ101 as better choice. |
|