Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Leica C-Lux vs Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Specs |
|
|
C-Lux
All specs: Main page for C-Lux |
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
|
C-Lux vs DMC FZ1000 II Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:
Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter. 1″ sensor built into both cameras has a total area of about 116mm² (4.6 sq.in.). |
|
C-Lux vs DMC FZ1000 II: Viewfinder C-Lux has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.33 megapixel with magnification of 0.53x. The DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
C-Lux (0.53x) |
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
|
|
Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Leica C-Lux VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Leica C-Lux a better choice |
||
|
C-Lux |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 25600 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Weighs less (2) | 340g (11.0 oz.) |
810g (26.1 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 334cm³ (21 cu.in.) |
1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the C-Lux are the larger sensitivity, the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size. The C-Lux scores 8 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
C-Lux |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 12 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.33 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 1.24 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 370 | 440 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are that the camera is faster, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the articulated display, the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone. Another advantage over the C-Lux: that the battery has more stamina. Yields 19 points for the DMC FZ1000 II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
C-Lux |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Sensor format | 1″ | 1″ |
| Resolution (megapixel) | 20.10 | 20.10 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Leica C-Lux VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the C-Lux and DMC FZ1000 II |
|
 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
 |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Leica C-Lux |
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
8
|
19
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|