Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon EOS M50 vs Sony Alpha A7R III Specs |
|
|
EOS M50
All specs: Main page for EOS M50 |
Alpha A7R III
All specs: Main page for Alpha A7R III |
|
EOS M50 vs Alpha A7R III Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Advantage: Sony Alpha A7R III |
|
EOS M50 vs Alpha A7R III: Viewfinder EOS M50 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.60x. Alpha A7R III has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 3.69 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.78x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
EOS M50 (0.60x) |
Alpha A7R III (0.78x) |
|
|
Better choice: Sony Alpha A7R III |
||
|
Canon EOS M50 VS Sony Alpha A7R III Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon EOS M50 a better choice |
||
|
EOS M50 |
Alpha A7R III |
|
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Weighs less (2) | 387g (12.5 oz.) |
657g (21.2 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 601cm³ (38 cu.in.) |
894cm³ (56 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the EOS M50 are the built-in flash, the lower weight than the Alpha A7R III and the more compact size. The EOS M50 scores 6 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Alpha A7R III |
||
|
EOS M50 |
Alpha A7R III |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | APS-C | Full frame |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 24.10 | 42.40 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 143 | 399 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 25600 ISO | 100 – 32000 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 3.69 |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 7 | 50 |
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 1.44 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 235 | 650 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Alpha A7R III are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Sony are the larger sensitivity, the better viewfinder and the larger selection of lenses. We also like the optical image stabilizer, that the display has a higher resolution and that the battery has more stamina. Another advantage over the EOS M50: the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. Yields 35 points for the Alpha A7R III. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
EOS M50 |
Alpha A7R III |
|
| Speed (frames/second) | 10 | 10 |
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Video resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Canon EOS M50 VS Sony Alpha A7R III Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the EOS M50 and Alpha A7R III |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon EOS M50 |
Sony Alpha A7R III |
|
6
|
35
|
|
We recommend Sony Alpha A7R III as better choice. |
|