Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Canon PowerShot SX700 HS Compare

Posted on by

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

DMC FZ1000 II vs PowerShot SX700 HS - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Canon PowerShot SX700 HS Specs

DMC FZ1000 II

  • Introduced in February 2019
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1″
  • 20 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 125 – 12800 ISO
  • 4096 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 24-400mm (17x), f2.8-4.0
  • WiFi built-in
  • 136 x 97.2 x 131.5mm³ (5.4″ x 3.8″ x 5.2″)
  • 810g (26.1 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II

PowerShot SX700 HS

  • Introduced in February 2014
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 16 megapixel
  • 3 frames/second
  • 100 – 3200 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor
  • Zoom 25-750mm (30x), f3.2-6.9
  • WiFi built-in
  • 112.7 x 65.8 x 34.8mm³ (4.4″ x 2.6″ x 1.4″)
  • 270g (8.7 oz.)

All specs: Main page for PowerShot SX700 HS

DMC FZ1000 II vs PowerShot SX700 HS: The sensors

The DMC FZ1000 II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the PowerShot SX700 HS uses a Compact sensor.

Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC FZ1000 II is a lot larger than the PowerShot SX700 HS’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format.

Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II

Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Canon PowerShot SX700 HS Other Specs Comparison

Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice

DMC FZ1000 II

PowerShot SX700 HS
Larger sensor (5)

1″ Compact
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)

20.10 16.10
Higher speed (4, frames/second)

12 3
Auto Focus points (4)

49 9
Better sensibility (4)

125 – 12800 ISO 100 – 3200 ISO
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)

1.24 0.92
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)

4096 x 2160 1920 x 1080
External microphone (2)
Longer battery life (3, photos)

440 250

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the larger sensitivity and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the articulated display, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina.

The DMC FZ1000 II scores 35 points.

Otherwise why to choose Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

DMC FZ1000 II

PowerShot SX700 HS
Weighs less (2)

810g
(26.1 oz.)		 270g
(8.7 oz.)
More portable (2)

1738cm³
(110 cu.in.)		 258cm³
(16 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot SX700 HS are the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size.

Yields 4 points for the PowerShot SX700 HS.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

DMC FZ1000 II

PowerShot SX700 HS
Built-in flash
Image stabilizer
WiFi
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Canon PowerShot SX700 HS Dimensions

Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and PowerShot SX700 HS

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

35
4

We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice.