Canon PowerShot SX620 HS vs Panasonic DMC FZ1000 Compare

Posted on by

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

PowerShot SX620 HS vs DMC FZ1000 - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS vs Panasonic DMC FZ1000 Specs

PowerShot SX620 HS

  • Introduced in May 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 20 megapixel
  • 2 frames/second
  • 100 – 3200 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor
  • Zoom 25-625mm (25x), f3.3-6.6
  • WiFi built-in
  • 96.9 x 56.9 x 27.9mm³ (3.8″ x 2.2″ x 1.1″)
  • 182g (5.9 oz.)

All specs: Main page for PowerShot SX620 HS

DMC FZ1000

  • Introduced in July 2014
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1″
  • 20 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 125 – 12800 ISO
  • 4096 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 24-400mm (17x), f2.8-4.0
  • WiFi built-in
  • 137 x 98.5 x 130.7mm³ (5.4″ x 3.9″ x 5.1″)
  • 831g (26.8 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000

PowerShot SX620 HS vs DMC FZ1000: The sensors

The PowerShot SX620 HS features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ1000 uses a 1″ sensor.

Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ1000’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the PowerShot SX620 HS employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips.

Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 Other Specs Comparison

Why is Canon PowerShot SX620 HS a better choice

PowerShot SX620 HS

DMC FZ1000
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)

20.30 20.10
Touch screen (2)
Weighs less (2)

182g
(5.9 oz.)		 831g
(26.8 oz.)
More portable (2)

154cm³
(10 cu.in.)		 1764cm³
(111 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS are the higher resolution, the rather comfortable touch screen and the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000. Another advantage over the DMC FZ1000: the more compact size.

The PowerShot SX620 HS scores 11 points.

Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ1000

PowerShot SX620 HS

DMC FZ1000
Larger sensor (5)

Compact 1″
Higher speed (4, frames/second)

2 12
Auto Focus points (4)

9 49
Better sensibility (4)

100 – 3200 ISO 125 – 12800 ISO
Articulated monitor (2)
Better Video (2)

1920 x 1080 4096 x 2160
External microphone (2)
Longer battery life (3, photos)

295 360

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 are the larger sensor, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, the articulated display and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina.

Yields 26 points for the DMC FZ1000.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

PowerShot SX620 HS

DMC FZ1000
Built-in flash
Image stabilizer
Sensor resolution (MP)

0.92 0.92
WiFi
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 Dimensions

Look at front view of the PowerShot SX620 HS and DMC FZ1000

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Panasonic DMC FZ1000

11
26

We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 as better choice.