Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Enthusiast Compact cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
Canon PowerShot G1 X Mk. III vs Olympus Stylus XZ-2: Specifications at a glance |
|
PowerShot G1 X Mk. III
All specs: Main page for PowerShot G1 X Mk. III |
Stylus XZ-2
All specs: Main page for Stylus XZ-2 |
PowerShot G1 X Mk. III vs Stylus XZ-2: The sensors |
|
The PowerShot G1 X Mk. III features a APS-C sized sensor, while the Stylus XZ-2 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 332mm² (0.53 sq.in.) the sensor of the PowerShot G1 X Mk. III is a lot larger than the Stylus XZ-2’s chip at 42mm² (0.07 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Canon PowerShot G1 X Mk. III |
Canon PowerShot G1 X Mk. III VS Olympus Stylus XZ-2 Other Specs Comparison |
Why is Canon PowerShot G1 X Mk. III a better choice |
||
PowerShot G1 X Mk. III |
Stylus XZ-2 |
|
Larger sensor (5) | APS-C | Compact |
Sensor cleaning (3) | ||
Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 24.20 | 12.00 |
Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 9 | 2 |
Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 35 |
Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 25600 ISO | 100 – 12800 ISO |
Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 0.92 |
WiFi (2) | ||
Environmental sealing (2) | ||
Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot G1 X Mk. III are the larger sensor, built-in automatic sensor cleaning and the higher resolution. Additional pros for the Canon are that the camera is faster, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the larger sensitivity. We also like that the display has a higher resolution, the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. The PowerShot G1 X Mk. III scores 29 points. |
||
Otherwise why to choose Olympus Stylus XZ-2 |
||
PowerShot G1 X Mk. III |
Stylus XZ-2 |
|
Longer battery life (3, photos) | 200 | 340 |
More portable (2) | 460cm³ (29 cu.in.) |
353cm³ (22 cu.in.) |
Conclusion: Advantages of the Stylus XZ-2 are that the battery has more stamina and the more compact size. Yields 5 points for the Stylus XZ-2. |
||
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
PowerShot G1 X Mk. III |
Stylus XZ-2 |
|
Built-in flash | ||
Image stabilizer | ||
Articulated screen | ||
Touch screen | ||
Video resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Similar weight | 399g | 374g |
Canon PowerShot G1 X Mk. III VS Olympus Stylus XZ-2 Dimensions |
Look at front view of the PowerShot G1 X Mk. III and Stylus XZ-2 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
Canon PowerShot G1 X Mk. III |
Olympus Stylus XZ-2 |
29
|
5
|
We recommend Canon PowerShot G1 X Mk. III as better choice. |