Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Sony Cyber-shot HX400V Specs |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX400V
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot HX400V |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot HX400V: The sensors |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the Cyber-shot HX400V uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC FZ1000 II is a lot larger than the Cyber-shot HX400V’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot HX400V: Viewfinder DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.74x. The Cyber-shot HX400V has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 0.40 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.50x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
Cyber-shot HX400V (0.50x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot HX400V Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX400V |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 12 | 10 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 1 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 0.40 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.24 | 0.92 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 440 | 300 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the better viewfinder, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the superior video recording, the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina. The DMC FZ1000 II scores 28 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot HX400V |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX400V |
|
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 20.40 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 125 – 12800 ISO | 80 – 12800 ISO |
| Weighs less (2) | 810g (26.1 oz.) |
660g (21.3 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
1247cm³ (79 cu.in.) |
| GPS (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot HX400V are the higher resolution, the larger sensitivity and the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II. Another advantage over the DMC FZ1000 II: the more compact size and the built-in GPS. Yields 15 points for the Cyber-shot HX400V. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX400V |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot HX400V Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and Cyber-shot HX400V |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
Sony Cyber-shot HX400V |
|
28
|
15
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|