Canon Ixus 190 vs Panasonic DMC FZ200 Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

Ixus 190 vs DMC FZ200 - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Canon Ixus 190 vs Panasonic DMC FZ200 Specs

Ixus 190

  • Introduced in January 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 20 megapixel
  • 1 frames/second
  • 100 – 1600 ISO
  • 1280 x 720 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 68.00mm (2.7″) Monitor
  • Zoom 24-240mm (10x), f3.0-6.9
  • WiFi built-in
  • 95.2 x 56.8 x 23.6mm³ (3.7″ x 2.2″ x 0.9″)
  • 137g (4.4 oz.)

All specs: Main page for Ixus 190

DMC FZ200

  • Introduced in July 2012
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 12 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 100 – 3200 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 25-600mm (24x), f2.8-2.8
  • No WiFi
  • 125.2 x 86.6 x 110.2mm³ (4.9″ x 3.4″ x 4.3″)
  • 588g (19.0 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ200

Ixus 190 vs DMC FZ200: The sensors

Both cameras use the same sensor format, Compact.

The Compact sensor built into both cameras has a total area of about 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.).

Canon Ixus 190 VS Panasonic DMC FZ200 Other Specs Comparison

Why is Canon Ixus 190 a better choice

Ixus 190

DMC FZ200

Wider resolution (5, megapixel)

20.00 12.00
Weighs less (2)

137g
(4.4 oz.)
588g
(19.0 oz.)
More portable (2)

128cm³
(8 cu.in.)
1195cm³
(75 cu.in.)
WiFi (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the Ixus 190 are the higher resolution, the lower weight than the DMC FZ200 and the more compact size. Finally, there’s the the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection.

The Ixus 190 scores 11 points.

Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ200

Ixus 190

DMC FZ200

Higher speed (4, frames/second)

1 12
Auto Focus points (4)

9 23
Better sensibility (4)

100 – 1600 ISO 100 – 3200 ISO
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)

0.23 0.46
Articulated monitor (2)

Better Video (2)

1280 x 720 1920 x 1080
External microphone (2)

Longer battery life (3, photos)

190 500

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ200 are that the camera is faster, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the larger sensitivity. We also like that the display has a higher resolution, the articulated display and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DMC FZ200 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina.

Yields 23 points for the DMC FZ200.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

Ixus 190

DMC FZ200

Sensor format

Compact Compact
Built-in flash

Image stabilizer

Canon Ixus 190 VS Panasonic DMC FZ200 Dimensions

Look at front view of the Ixus 190 and DMC FZ200

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Canon Ixus 190

Panasonic DMC FZ200

11
23

We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ200 as better choice.