Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon EOS M50 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Specs |
|
|
EOS M50
All specs: Main page for EOS M50 |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
All specs: Main page for OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
EOS M50 vs OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Better choice: Canon EOS M50 |
|
EOS M50 vs OM-D E-M1 Mark II: Viewfinder EOS M50 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.60x. OM-D E-M1 Mark II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
EOS M50 (0.60x) |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II (0.74x) |
|
|
Note: Differences in the image area are the result of different image ratios, 3:2 or 4:3. That can make it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras. However, with these two cameras the difference is considerable in any case. |
||
|
Canon EOS M50 VS Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon EOS M50 a better choice |
||
|
EOS M50 |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 24.10 | 20.30 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 143 | 121 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 25600 ISO | 200 – 25600 ISO |
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Weighs less (2) | 387g (12.5 oz.) |
574g (18.5 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 601cm³ (38 cu.in.) |
840cm³ (53 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the EOS M50 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Canon are the larger sensitivity, the built-in flash and the lower weight than the OM-D E-M1 Mark II. Another advantage over the OM-D E-M1 Mark II: the more compact size. The EOS M50 scores 24 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
||
|
EOS M50 |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 15 |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 7 | 80 |
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 235 | 440 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II are that the camera is faster, the larger selection of lenses and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is the superior video recording, that the battery has more stamina and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. Yields 17 points for the OM-D E-M1 Mark II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
EOS M50 |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Sensor resolution (MP) | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Canon EOS M50 VS Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the EOS M50 and OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon EOS M50 |
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
24
|
17
|
|
We recommend Canon EOS M50 as better choice. |
|