Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P1000 vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Specs |
|
|
Coolpix P1000
All specs: Main page for Coolpix P1000 |
DMC FZ2000
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ2000 |
|
Coolpix P1000 vs DMC FZ2000: The sensors |
|
|
Coolpix P1000 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ2000 uses a 1″ sensor. Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ2000’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Coolpix P1000 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
|
Coolpix P1000 vs DMC FZ2000: Viewfinder Coolpix P1000 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.68x. The DMC FZ2000 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
Coolpix P1000 (0.68x) |
DMC FZ2000 (0.74x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
||
|
Nikon Coolpix P1000 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Nikon Coolpix P1000 a better choice |
||
|
Coolpix P1000 |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Auto Focus points (4) | 99 | 49 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Coolpix P1000 are the faster and more accurate auto focus. The Coolpix P1000 scores 4 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
||
|
Coolpix P1000 |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Compact | 1″ |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 16.00 | 20.10 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 7 | 12 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 6400 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 1.04 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 250 | 350 |
| Weighs less (2) | 1415g (45.6 oz.) |
966g (31.2 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 3151cm³ (198 cu.in.) |
1889cm³ (119 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ2000 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the DMC FZ2000 is made easy by the superior video recording, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the Coolpix P1000. Another advantage over the Coolpix P1000: the more compact size. Yields 31 points for the DMC FZ2000. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
Coolpix P1000 |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Nikon Coolpix P1000 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the Coolpix P1000 and DMC FZ2000 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P1000 |
Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
|
4
|
31
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ2000 as better choice. |
|
