Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P900 vs Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Specs |
|
|
Coolpix P900
All specs: Main page for Coolpix P900 |
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
|
Coolpix P900 vs DMC FZ1000 II: The sensors |
|
|
Coolpix P900 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ1000 II uses a 1″ sensor. Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ1000 II’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Coolpix P900 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
Coolpix P900 vs DMC FZ1000 II: Viewfinder Coolpix P900 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 0.92 megapixel with magnification of 0.50x. The DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
Coolpix P900 (0.50x) |
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Nikon Coolpix P900 VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Nikon Coolpix P900 a better choice |
||
|
Coolpix P900 |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Auto Focus points (4) | 99 | 49 |
| GPS (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Coolpix P900 are the faster and more accurate auto focus and the built-in GPS. The Coolpix P900 scores 6 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Coolpix P900 |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Compact | 1″ |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 16.00 | 20.10 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 7 | 12 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 6400 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 1.24 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 1920 x 1080 | 4096 x 2160 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 360 | 440 |
| More portable (2) | 1978cm³ (125 cu.in.) |
1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone. Another advantage over the Coolpix P900: that the battery has more stamina and the more compact size. Yields 35 points for the DMC FZ1000 II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
Coolpix P900 |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| Similar weight | 900g | 810g |
| WiFi | ||
| Nikon Coolpix P900 VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the Coolpix P900 and DMC FZ1000 II |
|
 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
 |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P900 |
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
6
|
35
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|