Canon Ixus 185 vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Compare

Posted on by

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

Ixus 185 vs DMC FZ2000 - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Canon Ixus 185 vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Specs

Ixus 185

  • Introduced in January 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 20 megapixel
  • 1 frames/second
  • 100 – 1600 ISO
  • 1280 x 720 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 68.00mm (2.7″) Monitor
  • Zoom 28-224mm (8x), f3.2-6.9
  • No WiFi
  • 95.2 x 54.3 x 22.1mm³ (3.7″ x 2.1″ x 0.9″)
  • 126g (4.1 oz.)

All specs: Main page for Ixus 185

DMC FZ2000

  • Introduced in September 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1″
  • 20 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 125 – 12800 ISO
  • 4096 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 24-480mm (20x), f2.8-4.5
  • WiFi built-in
  • 137.6 x 101.9 x 134.7mm³ (5.4″ x 4.0″ x 5.3″)
  • 966g (31.2 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ2000

Ixus 185 vs DMC FZ2000: The sensors

The Ixus 185 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ2000 uses a 1″ sensor.

Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ2000’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Ixus 185 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips.

Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ2000

Canon Ixus 185 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Other Specs Comparison

Why is Canon Ixus 185 a better choice

Ixus 185

DMC FZ2000
Weighs less (2)

126g
(4.1 oz.)		 966g
(31.2 oz.)
More portable (2)

114cm³
(7 cu.in.)		 1889cm³
(119 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the Ixus 185 are the lower weight than the DMC FZ2000 and the more compact size.

The Ixus 185 scores 4 points.

Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ2000

Ixus 185

DMC FZ2000
Larger sensor (5)

Compact 1″
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)

20.00 20.10
Higher speed (4, frames/second)

1 12
Auto Focus points (4)

9 49
Better sensibility (4)

100 – 1600 ISO 125 – 12800 ISO
Image stabilizer (3)
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)

0.23 1.04
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)

1280 x 720 4096 x 2160
External microphone (2)
Longer battery life (3, photos)

210 350
WiFi (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ2000 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the larger sensitivity and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is that the display has a higher resolution, the articulated display and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the DMC FZ2000 is made easy by the superior video recording, the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina. Another advantage over the Ixus 185: the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection.

Yields 40 points for the DMC FZ2000.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

Ixus 185

DMC FZ2000
Built-in flash
Canon Ixus 185 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Dimensions

Look at front view of the Ixus 185 and DMC FZ2000

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Canon Ixus 185

Panasonic DMC FZ2000

4
40

We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ2000 as better choice.