Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Sony Cyber-shot HX99 Specs |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX99
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot HX99 |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot HX99: The sensors |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the Cyber-shot HX99 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC FZ1000 II is a lot larger than the Cyber-shot HX99’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot HX99: Viewfinder DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.74x. The Cyber-shot HX99 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 0.64 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.50x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
Cyber-shot HX99 (0.50x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot HX99 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX99 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 18.20 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 12 | 10 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 1 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 0.64 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.24 | 0.92 |
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 440 | 390 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the superior video recording, the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina. The DMC FZ1000 II scores 31 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot HX99 |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX99 |
|
| Better sensibility (4) | 125 – 12800 ISO | 80 – 12800 ISO |
| Weighs less (2) | 810g (26.1 oz.) |
243g (7.8 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
210cm³ (13 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot HX99 are the larger sensitivity, the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size. Yields 8 points for the Cyber-shot HX99. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX99 |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot HX99 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and Cyber-shot HX99 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
Sony Cyber-shot HX99 |
|
31
|
8
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|