Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Professional DSLR cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III Specs |
|
|
EOS 1D X Mark II
All specs: Main page for EOS 1D X Mark II |
EOS 5D Mark III
All specs: Main page for EOS 5D Mark III |
|
EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS 5D Mark III Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:
|
|
EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS 5D Mark III: Viewfinder EOS 1D X Mark II has an optical viewfinder with penta prism. It has magnification of 0.76x and covers 100% of view field. The EOS 5D Mark III features an optical viewfinder with a penta prism that also covers 100% of the field of view, its magnification is c. 0.71x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
EOS 1D X Mark II (0.76x) |
EOS 5D Mark III (0.71x) |
|
|
Better choice: Canon EOS 1D X Mark II |
||
|
Canon EOS 1D X Mark II VS Canon EOS 5D Mark III Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon EOS 1D X Mark II a better choice |
||
|
EOS 1D X Mark II |
EOS 5D Mark III |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 14 | 6 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 51200 ISO | 100 – 25600 ISO |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.62 | 1.04 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 1210 | 950 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
| GPS (2) | ||
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the EOS 1D X Mark II are that the camera is faster, the larger sensitivity and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and that the battery has more stamina. Another advantage over the EOS 5D Mark III: the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video, the built-in GPS. The EOS 1D X Mark II scores 21 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Canon EOS 5D Mark III |
||
|
EOS 1D X Mark II |
EOS 5D Mark III |
|
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.20 | 22.30 |
| Weighs less (2) | 1340g (43.2 oz.) |
950g (30.6 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 2187cm³ (138 cu.in.) |
1352cm³ (85 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the EOS 5D Mark III are the higher resolution, the lower weight than the EOS 1D X Mark II and the more compact size. Yields 9 points for the EOS 5D Mark III. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
EOS 1D X Mark II |
EOS 5D Mark III |
|
| Sensor format | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Lens selection | 200 | 200 |
| External microphone | ||
| Canon EOS 1D X Mark II VS Canon EOS 5D Mark III Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the EOS 1D X Mark II and EOS 5D Mark III |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon EOS 1D X Mark II |
Canon EOS 5D Mark III |
|
21
|
9
|
|
We recommend Canon EOS 1D X Mark II as better choice. |
|