Canon EOS M50 vs Sigma sd Quattro H Compare

Posted on by

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.

EOS M50 vs sd Quattro H - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Canon EOS M50 vs Sigma sd Quattro H Specs

EOS M50

  • Introduced in February 2018
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 24 megapixel
  • 10 frames/second
  • 100 – 25600 ISO
  • 3840 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 80.00mm (3.1″) Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount EF-M
  • WiFi built-in
  • 116.3 x 88.1 x 58.7mm³ (4.6″ x 3.5″ x 2.3″)
  • 387g (12.5 oz.)

All specs: Main page for EOS M50

sd Quattro H

  • Introduced in February 2016
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C H
  • 45 megapixel
  • 3 frames/second
  • 100 – 6400 ISO
  • 0 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 76.00mm (3.0″) Monitor
  • Lens mount SA
  • No WiFi
  • 147 x 95.1 x 90.8mm³ (5.8″ x 3.7″ x 3.6″)
  • 649g (20.9 oz.)

All specs: Main page for sd Quattro H

EOS M50 vs sd Quattro H Sensors

On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:

Advantage: Sigma sd Quattro H

EOS M50 vs sd Quattro H: Viewfinder

EOS M50 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.60x.

sd Quattro H has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.69x.

Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x.

EOS M50 (0.60x)

sd Quattro H (0.69x)

Better choice: Sigma sd Quattro H

Canon EOS M50 VS Sigma sd Quattro H Other Specs Comparison

Why is Canon EOS M50 a better choice

EOS M50

sd Quattro H
Sensor cleaning (3)
Higher speed (4, frames/second)

10 3
Auto Focus points (4)

143 9
Better sensibility (4)

100 – 25600 ISO 100 – 6400 ISO
Larger lens selection (3)

7
Built-in flash (2)
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)

3840 x 2160 0
External microphone (2)
Weighs less (2)

387g
(12.5 oz.)		 649g
(20.9 oz.)
More portable (2)

601cm³
(38 cu.in.)		 1269cm³
(80 cu.in.)
WiFi (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the EOS M50 are built-in automatic sensor cleaning, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Canon are the larger sensitivity, the larger selection of lenses and the built-in flash. A nice touch is the articulated display, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the EOS M50 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone, the lower weight than the sd Quattro H and the more compact size. Finally, there’s the the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection.

The EOS M50 scores 34 points.

Otherwise why to choose Sigma sd Quattro H

EOS M50

sd Quattro H
Larger sensor (5)

APS-C APS-C H
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)

24.10 44.80
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)

1.04 1.62
Longer battery life (3, photos)

235 300
USB 3.0 (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the sd Quattro H are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is that the battery has more stamina and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video.

Yields 17 points for the sd Quattro H.
Canon EOS M50 VS Sigma sd Quattro H Dimensions

Look at front view of the EOS M50 and sd Quattro H

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Canon EOS M50

Sigma sd Quattro H

34
17

We recommend Canon EOS M50 as better choice.