Canon PowerShot G9 X Mk. II vs Fujifilm XF-10 Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Enthusiast Compact cameras.

PowerShot G9 X Mk. II vs XF-10 - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mk. II vs Fujifilm XF-10: Specifications at a glance

PowerShot G9 X Mk. II

  • Introduced in January 2017
  • Enthusiast Compact
  • Sensor: 1″
  • 20 megapixel
  • 8 frames/second
  • 125 – 12800 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor
  • Zoom 28-84mm (3x), f2.0-4.9
  • WiFi built-in
  • 98 x 58 x 31mm³ (3.9″ x 2.3″ x 1.2″)
  • 206g (6.6 oz.)

All specs: Main page for PowerShot G9 X Mk. II

XF-10

  • Introduced in July 2018
  • Enthusiast Compact
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 24 megapixel
  • 6 frames/second
  • 200 – 12800 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 76.00mm (3.0″) Monitor
  • Fixed lens 28mm, f2.8
  • WiFi built-in
  • 112.5 x 64 x 41mm³ (4.4″ x 2.5″ x 1.6″)
  • 279g (9.0 oz.)

All specs: Main page for XF-10

PowerShot G9 X Mk. II vs XF-10: The sensors

The PowerShot G9 X Mk. II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the XF-10 uses a APS-C sensor.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:

Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter.

Featuring an area of 371mm² (0.59 sq.in.), the XF-10’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the PowerShot G9 X Mk. II employs at 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with 1″ sized chips.

Advantage: Fujifilm XF-10

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mk. II VS Fujifilm XF-10 Other Specs Comparison

Why is Canon PowerShot G9 X Mk. II a better choice

PowerShot G9 X Mk. II

XF-10

Higher speed (4, frames/second)

8 6
Better sensibility (4)

125 – 12800 ISO 200 – 12800 ISO
Image stabilizer (3)

Weighs less (2)

206g
(6.6 oz.)
279g
(9.0 oz.)
More portable (2)

176cm³
(11 cu.in.)
295cm³
(19 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mk. II are that the camera is faster, the larger sensitivity and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is the lower weight than the XF-10 and the more compact size.

The PowerShot G9 X Mk. II scores 15 points.

Otherwise why to choose Fujifilm XF-10

PowerShot G9 X Mk. II

XF-10

Larger sensor (5)

1″ APS-C
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)

20.10 24.20
Auto Focus points (4)

31 91
External microphone (2)

Longer battery life (3, photos)

235 330

Conclusion: Advantages of the XF-10 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina.

Yields 19 points for the XF-10.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

PowerShot G9 X Mk. II

XF-10

Built-in flash

Sensor resolution (MP)

1.04 1.04
Touch screen

Video resolution

1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
WiFi

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mk. II VS Fujifilm XF-10 Dimensions

Look at front view of the PowerShot G9 X Mk. II and XF-10

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mk. II

Fujifilm XF-10

15
19

We advise to choose the newest model: Fujifilm XF-10.