Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon PowerShot SX540 HS vs Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Specs |
|
|
PowerShot SX540 HS
All specs: Main page for PowerShot SX540 HS |
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
|
PowerShot SX540 HS vs DMC FZ1000 II: The sensors |
|
|
The PowerShot SX540 HS features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ1000 II uses a 1″ sensor. Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ1000 II’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the PowerShot SX540 HS employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
Canon PowerShot SX540 HS VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon PowerShot SX540 HS a better choice |
||
|
PowerShot SX540 HS |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.30 | 20.10 |
| Weighs less (2) | 442g (14.3 oz.) |
810g (26.1 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 901cm³ (57 cu.in.) |
1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot SX540 HS are the higher resolution, the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size. The PowerShot SX540 HS scores 9 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
PowerShot SX540 HS |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Compact | 1″ |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 6 | 12 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 9 | 49 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 3200 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 0.46 | 1.24 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 1920 x 1080 | 4096 x 2160 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 205 | 440 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, that the display has a higher resolution and the articulated display. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone. Another advantage over the PowerShot SX540 HS: that the battery has more stamina. Yields 30 points for the DMC FZ1000 II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
PowerShot SX540 HS |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Canon PowerShot SX540 HS VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the PowerShot SX540 HS and DMC FZ1000 II |
|
 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
 |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon PowerShot SX540 HS |
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
9
|
30
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|