Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Specs |
|
|
PowerShot SX730 HS
All specs: Main page for PowerShot SX730 HS |
DMC FZ2000
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ2000 |
|
PowerShot SX730 HS vs DMC FZ2000: The sensors |
|
|
The PowerShot SX730 HS features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ2000 uses a 1″ sensor. Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ2000’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the PowerShot SX730 HS employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
|
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon PowerShot SX730 HS a better choice |
||
|
PowerShot SX730 HS |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.30 | 20.10 |
| Weighs less (2) | 300g (9.7 oz.) |
966g (31.2 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 282cm³ (18 cu.in.) |
1889cm³ (119 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot SX730 HS are the higher resolution, the lower weight than the DMC FZ2000 and the more compact size. The PowerShot SX730 HS scores 9 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
||
|
PowerShot SX730 HS |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Compact | 1″ |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 6 | 12 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 9 | 49 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 3200 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 1.04 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 1920 x 1080 | 4096 x 2160 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 250 | 350 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ2000 are the larger sensor, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the DMC FZ2000 is made easy by the superior video recording, the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina. Yields 28 points for the DMC FZ2000. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
PowerShot SX730 HS |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Canon PowerShot SX730 HS VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the PowerShot SX730 HS and DMC FZ2000 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS |
Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
|
9
|
28
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ2000 as better choice. |
|