Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Sony Alpha A6400 Specs |
|
|
GFX 50R
All specs: Main page for GFX 50R |
Alpha A6400
All specs: Main page for Alpha A6400 |
|
GFX 50R vs Alpha A6400 Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Better choice: Fujifilm GFX 50R |
|
GFX 50R vs Alpha A6400: Viewfinder GFX 50R has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 3.69 megapixel with magnification of 0.77x. Alpha A6400 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.70x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
GFX 50R (0.77x) |
Alpha A6400 (0.70x) |
|
|
Note: Differences in the image area are the result of different image ratios, 3:2 or 4:3. That can make it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras. |
||
|
Fujifilm GFX 50R VS Sony Alpha A6400 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Fujifilm GFX 50R a better choice |
||
|
GFX 50R |
Alpha A6400 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Medium format | APS-C |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 51.40 | 24.30 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 3.69 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 0.92 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the GFX 50R are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the better viewfinder. We also like that the display has a higher resolution and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. The GFX 50R scores 18 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Alpha A6400 |
||
|
GFX 50R |
Alpha A6400 |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 3 | 11 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 117 | 425 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 12800 ISO | 100 – 32000 ISO |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 5 | 50 |
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Weighs less (2) | 775g (25.0 oz.) |
361g (11.6 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1030cm³ (65 cu.in.) |
401cm³ (25 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Alpha A6400 are that the camera is faster, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the larger sensitivity. We also like the larger selection of lenses, the built-in flash and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the Alpha A6400 is made easy by the lower weight than the GFX 50R and the more compact size. Yields 23 points for the Alpha A6400. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
GFX 50R |
Alpha A6400 |
|
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Fujifilm GFX 50R VS Sony Alpha A6400 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the GFX 50R and Alpha A6400 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Fujifilm GFX 50R |
Sony Alpha A6400 |
|
18
|
23
|
|
We recommend Sony Alpha A6400 as better choice. |
|