Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Specs |
|
|
X-T3
All specs: Main page for X-T3 |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II
All specs: Main page for OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
X-T3 vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Better choice: Fujifilm X-T3 |
|
X-T3 vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II: Viewfinder X-T3 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 3.69 megapixel with magnification of 0.75x. OM-D E-M5 Mark II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
X-T3 (0.75x) |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II (0.74x) |
|
|
Note: Differences in the image area are the result of different image ratios, 3:2 or 4:3. That can make it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras. |
||
|
Fujifilm X-T3 VS Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Fujifilm X-T3 a better choice |
||
|
X-T3 |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 26.10 | 16.10 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 20 | 10 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 425 | 81 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 3.69 | 2.36 |
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the X-T3 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the better viewfinder and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the X-T3 is made easy by the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. The X-T3 scores 26 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
||
|
X-T3 |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
| Better sensibility (4) | 160 – 12800 ISO | 200 – 25600 ISO |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 25 | 80 |
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 390 | 750 |
| Weighs less (2) | 539g (17.4 oz.) |
469g (15.1 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 723cm³ (46 cu.in.) |
468cm³ (29 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the OM-D E-M5 Mark II are the larger sensitivity, the larger selection of lenses and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is that the battery has more stamina, the lower weight than the X-T3 and the more compact size. Yields 17 points for the OM-D E-M5 Mark II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
X-T3 |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Sensor resolution (MP) | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Fujifilm X-T3 VS Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the X-T3 and OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Fujifilm X-T3 |
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
26
|
17
|
|
We recommend Fujifilm X-T3 as better choice. |
|