Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony Alpha A6500 Specs |
|
|
X-T3
All specs: Main page for X-T3 |
Alpha A6500
All specs: Main page for Alpha A6500 |
|
X-T3 vs Alpha A6500 Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:
|
|
X-T3 vs Alpha A6500: Viewfinder X-T3 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 3.69 megapixel with magnification of 0.75x. Alpha A6500 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.70x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
X-T3 (0.75x) |
Alpha A6500 (0.70x) |
|
|
Better choice: Fujifilm X-T3 |
||
|
Fujifilm X-T3 VS Sony Alpha A6500 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Fujifilm X-T3 a better choice |
||
|
X-T3 |
Alpha A6500 |
|
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 26.10 | 24.20 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 20 | 11 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 3.69 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 0.92 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 390 | 350 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the X-T3 are the higher resolution, that the camera is faster and the better viewfinder. We also like that the display has a higher resolution, that the battery has more stamina and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. The X-T3 scores 20 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Alpha A6500 |
||
|
X-T3 |
Alpha A6500 |
|
| Better sensibility (4) | 160 – 12800 ISO | 100 – 25600 ISO |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 25 | 50 |
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Weighs less (2) | 539g (17.4 oz.) |
453g (14.6 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 723cm³ (46 cu.in.) |
428cm³ (27 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Alpha A6500 are the larger sensitivity, the larger selection of lenses and the built-in flash. A nice touch is the optical image stabilizer, the lower weight than the X-T3 and the more compact size. Yields 16 points for the Alpha A6500. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
X-T3 |
Alpha A6500 |
|
| Sensor format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Video resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Fujifilm X-T3 VS Sony Alpha A6500 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the X-T3 and Alpha A6500 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Fujifilm X-T3 |
Sony Alpha A6500 |
|
20
|
16
|
|
We advise to choose the newest model: Fujifilm X-T3. |
|