Fujifilm X-T30 vs Sigma sd Quattro Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.

X-T30 vs sd Quattro - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Fujifilm X-T30 vs Sigma sd Quattro Specs


  • Introduced in February 2019
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 26 megapixel
  • 8 frames/second
  • 200 – 12800 ISO
  • 3840 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 76.00mm (3.0″) Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount X-Bajonett
  • WiFi built-in
  • 118.4 x 82.8 x 46.8mm³ (4.7″ x 3.3″ x 1.8″)
  • 383g (12.4 oz.)

All specs: Main page for X-T30

sd Quattro

  • Introduced in February 2016
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 29 megapixel
  • 3 frames/second
  • 100 – 6400 ISO
  • 0 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 76.00mm (3.0″) Monitor
  • Lens mount SA
  • No WiFi
  • 147 x 95.1 x 90.8mm³ (5.8″ x 3.7″ x 3.6″)
  • 625g (20.2 oz.)

All specs: Main page for sd Quattro

X-T30 vs sd Quattro Sensors

On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:

Info graphic: X-T30 an sd Quattro sensor comparison

X-T30 vs sd Quattro: Viewfinder

X-T30 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.62x.

sd Quattro has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.69x.

Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x.

X-T30 (0.62x)

sd Quattro (0.69x)

Better choice: Sigma sd Quattro

Fujifilm X-T30 VS Sigma sd Quattro Other Specs Comparison

Why is Fujifilm X-T30 a better choice


sd Quattro

Sensor cleaning (3)

Higher speed (4, frames/second)

8 3
Auto Focus points (4)

425 9
Better sensibility (4)

200 – 12800 ISO 100 – 6400 ISO
Larger lens selection (3)

Built-in flash (2)

Articulated monitor (2)

Touch screen (2)

Better Video (2)

3840 x 2160 0
External microphone (2)

Longer battery life (3, photos)

380 300
Weighs less (2)

(12.4 oz.)
(20.2 oz.)
More portable (2)

(29 cu.in.)
(80 cu.in.)
WiFi (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the X-T30 are built-in automatic sensor cleaning, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the larger sensitivity, the larger selection of lenses and the built-in flash. A nice touch is the articulated display, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the X-T30 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the sd Quattro. Another advantage over the sd Quattro: the more compact size and the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection.

The X-T30 scores 37 points.

Otherwise why to choose Sigma sd Quattro


sd Quattro

Wider resolution (5, megapixel)

26.10 29.00
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)

1.04 1.62
USB 3.0 (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the sd Quattro are the higher resolution, that the display has a higher resolution and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video.

Yields 9 points for the sd Quattro.

Common Specs for both cameras compared


sd Quattro

Sensor format

Fujifilm X-T30 VS Sigma sd Quattro Dimensions

Look at front view of the X-T30 and sd Quattro

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Fujifilm X-T30

Sigma sd Quattro


We recommend Fujifilm X-T30 as better choice.