Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Leica C-Lux vs Nikon Coolpix P1000 Specs |
|
|
C-Lux
All specs: Main page for C-Lux |
Coolpix P1000
All specs: Main page for Coolpix P1000 |
|
C-Lux vs Coolpix P1000: The sensors |
|
|
C-Lux features a 1″ sized sensor, while the Coolpix P1000 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the C-Lux is a lot larger than the Coolpix P1000’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Leica C-Lux |
|
C-Lux vs Coolpix P1000: Viewfinder C-Lux has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.33 megapixel with magnification of 0.53x. The Coolpix P1000 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.68x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
C-Lux (0.53x) |
Coolpix P1000 (0.68x) |
|
|
Advantage: Nikon Coolpix P1000 |
||
|
Leica C-Lux VS Nikon Coolpix P1000 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Leica C-Lux a better choice |
||
|
C-Lux |
Coolpix P1000 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 16.00 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 7 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 25600 ISO | 100 – 6400 ISO |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 0.92 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 370 | 250 |
| Weighs less (2) | 340g (11.0 oz.) |
1415g (45.6 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 334cm³ (21 cu.in.) |
3151cm³ (198 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the C-Lux are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Leica are the larger sensitivity, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the C-Lux is made easy by that the battery has more stamina, the lower weight than the Coolpix P1000 and the more compact size. The C-Lux scores 29 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Nikon Coolpix P1000 |
||
|
C-Lux |
Coolpix P1000 |
|
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 99 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.33 | 2.36 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| External microphone (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Coolpix P1000 are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the better viewfinder and the articulated display. A recommendation of the Coolpix P1000 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone. Yields 12 points for the Coolpix P1000. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
C-Lux |
Coolpix P1000 |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Video resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| WiFi | ||
| Leica C-Lux VS Nikon Coolpix P1000 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the C-Lux and Coolpix P1000 |
|
 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
 |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Leica C-Lux |
Nikon Coolpix P1000 |
|
29
|
12
|
|
We recommend Leica C-Lux as better choice. |
|