Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Leica C-Lux vs Sony Cyber-shot HX350 Specs |
|
|
C-Lux
All specs: Main page for C-Lux |
Cyber-shot HX350
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot HX350 |
|
C-Lux vs Cyber-shot HX350: The sensors |
|
|
C-Lux features a 1″ sized sensor, while the Cyber-shot HX350 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the C-Lux is a lot larger than the Cyber-shot HX350’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Leica C-Lux |
|
C-Lux vs Cyber-shot HX350: Viewfinder C-Lux has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.33 megapixel with magnification of 0.53x. The Cyber-shot HX350 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 0.25 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.50x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
C-Lux (0.53x) |
Cyber-shot HX350 (0.50x) |
|
|
Advantage: Leica C-Lux |
||
|
Leica C-Lux VS Sony Cyber-shot HX350 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Leica C-Lux a better choice |
||
|
C-Lux |
Cyber-shot HX350 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 1 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 25600 ISO | 80 – 3200 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.33 | 0.25 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 0.92 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Weighs less (2) | 340g (11.0 oz.) |
652g (21.0 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 334cm³ (21 cu.in.) |
1244cm³ (78 cu.in.) |
| WiFi (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the C-Lux are the larger sensor, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the larger sensitivity. We also like the better viewfinder, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the C-Lux is made easy by the superior video recording, the lower weight than the Cyber-shot HX350 and the more compact size. Finally, there’s the the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. The C-Lux scores 29 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot HX350 |
||
|
C-Lux |
Cyber-shot HX350 |
|
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 370 | 380 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot HX350 are the articulated display and that the battery has more stamina. Yields 5 points for the Cyber-shot HX350. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
C-Lux |
Cyber-shot HX350 |
|
| Resolution (megapixel) | 20.10 | 20.10 |
| Speed (frames/second) | 10 | 10 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Leica C-Lux VS Sony Cyber-shot HX350 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the C-Lux and Cyber-shot HX350 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Leica C-Lux |
Sony Cyber-shot HX350 |
|
29
|
5
|
|
We recommend Leica C-Lux as better choice. |
|