Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Leica C-Lux vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II Specs |
|
|
C-Lux
All specs: Main page for C-Lux |
Cyber-shot RX10 II
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot RX10 II |
|
C-Lux vs Cyber-shot RX10 II Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:
Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter. 1″ sensor built into both cameras has a total area of about 116mm² (4.6 sq.in.). |
|
C-Lux vs Cyber-shot RX10 II: Viewfinder C-Lux has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.33 megapixel with magnification of 0.53x. The Cyber-shot RX10 II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.70x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
C-Lux (0.53x) |
Cyber-shot RX10 II (0.70x) |
|
|
Better choice: Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II |
||
|
Leica C-Lux VS Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Leica C-Lux a better choice |
||
|
C-Lux |
Cyber-shot RX10 II |
|
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 25 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 25600 ISO | 100 – 12800 ISO |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Weighs less (2) | 340g (11.0 oz.) |
770g (24.8 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 334cm³ (21 cu.in.) |
1161cm³ (73 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the C-Lux are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the larger sensitivity and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the C-Lux is made easy by the lower weight than the Cyber-shot RX10 II and the more compact size. The C-Lux scores 14 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II |
||
|
C-Lux |
Cyber-shot RX10 II |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 14 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.33 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 1.23 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 370 | 400 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot RX10 II are that the camera is faster, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the articulated display, the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina. Yields 17 points for the Cyber-shot RX10 II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
C-Lux |
Cyber-shot RX10 II |
|
| Sensor format | 1″ | 1″ |
| Resolution (megapixel) | 20.10 | 20.10 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Video resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| WiFi | ||
| Leica C-Lux VS Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the C-Lux and Cyber-shot RX10 II |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Leica C-Lux |
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II |
|
14
|
17
|
|
We advise to choose the newest model: Leica C-Lux. |
|