Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P610 vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Specs |
|
|
Coolpix P610
All specs: Main page for Coolpix P610 |
DMC FZ2000
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ2000 |
|
Coolpix P610 vs DMC FZ2000: The sensors |
|
|
Coolpix P610 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ2000 uses a 1″ sensor. Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ2000’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Coolpix P610 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
|
Coolpix P610 vs DMC FZ2000: Viewfinder Coolpix P610 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 0.92 megapixel with magnification of 0.50x. The DMC FZ2000 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
Coolpix P610 (0.50x) |
DMC FZ2000 (0.74x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
||
|
Nikon Coolpix P610 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Nikon Coolpix P610 a better choice |
||
|
Coolpix P610 |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 360 | 350 |
| Weighs less (2) | 565g (18.2 oz.) |
966g (31.2 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1132cm³ (71 cu.in.) |
1889cm³ (119 cu.in.) |
| GPS (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Coolpix P610 are that the battery has more stamina, the lower weight than the DMC FZ2000 and the more compact size. Finally, there’s the the built-in GPS. The Coolpix P610 scores 9 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
||
|
Coolpix P610 |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Compact | 1″ |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 16.00 | 20.10 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 7 | 12 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 1 | 49 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 6400 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 1.04 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 1920 x 1080 | 4096 x 2160 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ2000 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the larger sensitivity and the better viewfinder. We also like that the display has a higher resolution, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DMC FZ2000 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone. Yields 34 points for the DMC FZ2000. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
Coolpix P610 |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Nikon Coolpix P610 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the Coolpix P610 and DMC FZ2000 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P610 |
Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
|
9
|
34
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ2000 as better choice. |
|