Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P900 vs Panasonic DC TZ202 Specs |
|
|
Coolpix P900
All specs: Main page for Coolpix P900 |
DC TZ202
All specs: Main page for DC TZ202 |
|
Coolpix P900 vs DC TZ202: The sensors |
|
|
Coolpix P900 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DC TZ202 uses a 1″ sensor. Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DC TZ202’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Coolpix P900 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips. Better choice: Panasonic DC TZ202 |
|
Coolpix P900 vs DC TZ202: Viewfinder Coolpix P900 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 0.92 megapixel with magnification of 0.50x. The DC TZ202 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.33 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.53x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
Coolpix P900 (0.50x) |
DC TZ202 (0.53x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DC TZ202 |
||
|
Nikon Coolpix P900 VS Panasonic DC TZ202 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Nikon Coolpix P900 a better choice |
||
|
Coolpix P900 |
DC TZ202 |
|
| Auto Focus points (4) | 99 | 49 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| GPS (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Coolpix P900 are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the articulated display and the built-in GPS. The Coolpix P900 scores 8 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DC TZ202 |
||
|
Coolpix P900 |
DC TZ202 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Compact | 1″ |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 16.00 | 20.10 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 7 | 10 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 6400 ISO | 80 – 25600 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 2.33 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 1.04 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 360 | 370 |
| Weighs less (2) | 900g (29.0 oz.) |
340g (11.0 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1978cm³ (125 cu.in.) |
334cm³ (21 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DC TZ202 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and that the battery has more stamina. Another advantage over the Coolpix P900: the lower weight than the Coolpix P900 and the more compact size. Yields 35 points for the DC TZ202. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
Coolpix P900 |
DC TZ202 |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Nikon Coolpix P900 VS Panasonic DC TZ202 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the Coolpix P900 and DC TZ202 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P900 |
Panasonic DC TZ202 |
|
8
|
35
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DC TZ202 as better choice. |
|