Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1X vs Fujifilm X-Pro2 Specs |
|
|
OM-D E-M1X
All specs: Main page for OM-D E-M1X |
X-Pro2
All specs: Main page for X-Pro2 |
|
OM-D E-M1X vs X-Pro2 Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Advantage: Fujifilm X-Pro2 |
|
OM-D E-M1X vs X-Pro2: Viewfinder OM-D E-M1X has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.83x. The X-Pro2 features an electronic viefinder with a resolution of 2.36 Megapixel and a magnification of around 0.60x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
OM-D E-M1X (0.83x) |
X-Pro2 (0.60x) |
|
|
Note: Differences in the image area are the result of different image ratios, 3:2 or 4:3. That can make it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras. However, with these two cameras the difference is considerable in any case. |
||
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1X VS Fujifilm X-Pro2 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Olympus OM-D E-M1X a better choice |
||
|
OM-D E-M1X |
X-Pro2 |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 18 | 8 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 121 | 77 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 64 – 25600 ISO | 200 – 12800 ISO |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 80 | 25 |
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 870 | 350 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
| GPS (2) | ||
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the OM-D E-M1X are that the camera is faster, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the larger sensitivity. We also like the larger selection of lenses, the optical image stabilizer and the articulated display. A recommendation of the OM-D E-M1X is made easy by the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and that the battery has more stamina. Another advantage over the X-Pro2: the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video, the built-in GPS. The OM-D E-M1X scores 31 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Fujifilm X-Pro2 |
||
|
OM-D E-M1X |
X-Pro2 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.40 | 24.30 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 1.62 |
| Weighs less (2) | 997g (32.2 oz.) |
445g (14.4 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1707cm³ (108 cu.in.) |
494cm³ (31 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the X-Pro2 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the lower weight than the OM-D E-M1X and the more compact size. Yields 16 points for the X-Pro2. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
OM-D E-M1X |
X-Pro2 |
|
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Olympus OM-D E-M1X VS Fujifilm X-Pro2 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the OM-D E-M1X and X-Pro2 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Fujifilm X-Pro2 |
|
31
|
16
|
|
We recommend Olympus OM-D E-M1X as better choice. |
|