Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1X vs Sony Alpha A6400 Specs |
|
|
OM-D E-M1X
All specs: Main page for OM-D E-M1X |
Alpha A6400
All specs: Main page for Alpha A6400 |
|
OM-D E-M1X vs Alpha A6400 Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Advantage: Sony Alpha A6400 |
|
OM-D E-M1X vs Alpha A6400: Viewfinder OM-D E-M1X has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.83x. Alpha A6400 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.70x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
OM-D E-M1X (0.83x) |
Alpha A6400 (0.70x) |
|
|
Note: Differences in the image area are the result of different image ratios, 3:2 or 4:3. That can make it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras. However, with these two cameras the difference is considerable in any case. |
||
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1X VS Sony Alpha A6400 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Olympus OM-D E-M1X a better choice |
||
|
OM-D E-M1X |
Alpha A6400 |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 18 | 11 |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 80 | 50 |
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 0.92 |
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 870 | 400 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
| GPS (2) | ||
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the OM-D E-M1X are that the camera is faster, the larger selection of lenses and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is that the display has a higher resolution, the superior video recording and that the battery has more stamina. Another advantage over the Alpha A6400: the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video, the built-in GPS. The OM-D E-M1X scores 21 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Alpha A6400 |
||
|
OM-D E-M1X |
Alpha A6400 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.40 | 24.30 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 121 | 425 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 64 – 25600 ISO | 100 – 32000 ISO |
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Weighs less (2) | 997g (32.2 oz.) |
361g (11.6 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1707cm³ (108 cu.in.) |
401cm³ (25 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Alpha A6400 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Sony are the larger sensitivity, the built-in flash and the lower weight than the OM-D E-M1X. Another advantage over the OM-D E-M1X: the more compact size. Yields 24 points for the Alpha A6400. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
OM-D E-M1X |
Alpha A6400 |
|
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Olympus OM-D E-M1X VS Sony Alpha A6400 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the OM-D E-M1X and Alpha A6400 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Sony Alpha A6400 |
|
21
|
24
|
|
We advise to choose the newest model: Olympus OM-D E-M1X. |
|