Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DC FZ82 vs Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Specs |
|
|
DC FZ82
All specs: Main page for DC FZ82 |
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
|
DC FZ82 vs DMC FZ1000 II: The sensors |
|
|
DC FZ82 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ1000 II uses a 1″ sensor. Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ1000 II’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the DC FZ82 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
DC FZ82 vs DMC FZ1000 II: Viewfinder DC FZ82 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 1.16 megapixel with magnification of 0.46x. The DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DC FZ82 (0.46x) |
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Panasonic DC FZ82 VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DC FZ82 a better choice |
||
|
DC FZ82 |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Weighs less (2) | 616g (19.9 oz.) |
810g (26.1 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1464cm³ (92 cu.in.) |
1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DC FZ82 are the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size. The DC FZ82 scores 4 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
DC FZ82 |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Compact | 1″ |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 18.10 | 20.10 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 12 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 1.16 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 1.24 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 330 | 440 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the better viewfinder, that the display has a higher resolution and the articulated display. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina. Yields 27 points for the DMC FZ1000 II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DC FZ82 |
DMC FZ1000 II |
|
| Sensitivity | 125 – 12800 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Video resolution | 4096 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| WiFi | ||
| Panasonic DC FZ82 VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DC FZ82 and DMC FZ1000 II |
|
![]() |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
![]() |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DC FZ82 |
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
4
|
27
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|


