Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Leica C-Lux Specs |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
C-Lux
All specs: Main page for C-Lux |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs C-Lux Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:
Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter. 1″ sensor built into both cameras has a total area of about 116mm² (4.6 sq.in.). |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs C-Lux: Viewfinder DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.74x. The C-Lux has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.33 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.53x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
C-Lux (0.53x) |
|
|
Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Leica C-Lux Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
C-Lux |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 12 | 10 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 2.33 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.24 | 1.04 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 440 | 370 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are that the camera is faster, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the articulated display, the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone. Another advantage over the C-Lux: that the battery has more stamina. The DMC FZ1000 II scores 19 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Leica C-Lux |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
C-Lux |
|
| Better sensibility (4) | 125 – 12800 ISO | 80 – 25600 ISO |
| Weighs less (2) | 810g (26.1 oz.) |
340g (11.0 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
334cm³ (21 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the C-Lux are the larger sensitivity, the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size. Yields 8 points for the C-Lux. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
C-Lux |
|
| Sensor format | 1″ | 1″ |
| Resolution (megapixel) | 20.10 | 20.10 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Leica C-Lux Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and C-Lux |
|
 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
 |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
Leica C-Lux |
|
19
|
8
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|