Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Sony Cyber-shot WX500 Specs |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot WX500
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot WX500 |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot WX500: The sensors |
|
|
The DMC FZ1000 II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the Cyber-shot WX500 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC FZ1000 II is a lot larger than the Cyber-shot WX500’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot WX500 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot WX500 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 18.20 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 12 | 10 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 1 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.24 | 0.92 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 440 | 400 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the superior video recording, the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina. The DMC FZ1000 II scores 29 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot WX500 |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot WX500 |
|
| Better sensibility (4) | 125 – 12800 ISO | 80 – 12800 ISO |
| Weighs less (2) | 810g (26.1 oz.) |
209g (6.7 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
210cm³ (13 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot WX500 are the larger sensitivity, the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size. Yields 8 points for the Cyber-shot WX500. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot WX500 |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot WX500 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and Cyber-shot WX500 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
Sony Cyber-shot WX500 |
|
29
|
8
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|