Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 vs Panasonic DMC FZ200 Specs |
|
|
DMC TZ101
All specs: Main page for DMC TZ101 |
DMC FZ200
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ200 |
|
DMC TZ101 vs DMC FZ200: The sensors |
|
|
DMC TZ101 features a 1″ sized sensor, while the DMC FZ200 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC TZ101 is a lot larger than the DMC FZ200’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC TZ101 |
|
DMC TZ101 vs DMC FZ200: Viewfinder DMC TZ101 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 1.16 megapixel with magnification of 0.46x. The DMC FZ200 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 1.30 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.50x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC TZ101 (0.46x) |
DMC FZ200 (0.50x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ200 |
||
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 VS Panasonic DMC FZ200 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC TZ101 a better choice |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
DMC FZ200 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 12.00 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 23 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 25600 ISO | 100 – 3200 ISO |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 0.46 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Weighs less (2) | 310g (10.0 oz.) |
588g (19.0 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 317cm³ (20 cu.in.) |
1195cm³ (75 cu.in.) |
| WiFi (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC TZ101 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the DMC TZ101 is made easy by the superior video recording, the lower weight than the DMC FZ200 and the more compact size. Finally, there’s the the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. The DMC TZ101 scores 30 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ200 |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
DMC FZ200 |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 12 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 1.16 | 1.30 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 320 | 500 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ200 are that the camera is faster, the better viewfinder and the articulated display. A recommendation of the DMC FZ200 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina. Yields 15 points for the DMC FZ200. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
DMC FZ200 |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Panasonic DMC TZ101 VS Panasonic DMC FZ200 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC TZ101 and DMC FZ200 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 |
Panasonic DMC FZ200 |
|
30
|
15
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC TZ101 as better choice. |
|