Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon EOS R vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Specs |
|
|
EOS R
All specs: Main page for EOS R |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II
All specs: Main page for OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
EOS R vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Better choice: Canon EOS R |
|
EOS R vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II: Viewfinder EOS R has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 3.68 megapixel with magnification of 0.76x. OM-D E-M5 Mark II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
EOS R (0.76x) |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II (0.74x) |
|
|
Note: Differences in the image area are the result of different image ratios, 3:2 or 4:3. That can make it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras. |
||
|
Canon EOS R VS Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon EOS R a better choice |
||
|
EOS R |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 31.30 | 16.10 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 5955 | 81 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 40000 ISO | 200 – 25600 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 3.68 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 2.10 | 1.04 |
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the EOS R are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Canon are the larger sensitivity, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the superior video recording and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. The EOS R scores 28 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
||
|
EOS R |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 5 | 10 |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 4 | 80 |
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 370 | 750 |
| Weighs less (2) | 660g (21.3 oz.) |
469g (15.1 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1127cm³ (71 cu.in.) |
468cm³ (29 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the OM-D E-M5 Mark II are that the camera is faster, the larger selection of lenses and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is that the battery has more stamina, the lower weight than the EOS R and the more compact size. Yields 17 points for the OM-D E-M5 Mark II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
EOS R |
OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Canon EOS R VS Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the EOS R and OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon EOS R |
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II |
|
28
|
17
|
|
We recommend Canon EOS R as better choice. |
|