Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon EOS RP vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Specs |
|
|
EOS RP
All specs: Main page for EOS RP |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
All specs: Main page for OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
EOS RP vs OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Advantage: Canon EOS RP |
|
EOS RP vs OM-D E-M1 Mark II: Viewfinder EOS RP has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.70x. OM-D E-M1 Mark II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
EOS RP (0.70x) |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II (0.74x) |
|
|
Note: Differences in the image area are the result of different image ratios, 3:2 or 4:3. That can make it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras. |
||
|
Canon EOS RP VS Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon EOS RP a better choice |
||
|
EOS RP |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 26.20 | 20.30 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 4779 | 121 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 40000 ISO | 200 – 25600 ISO |
| Weighs less (2) | 485g (15.6 oz.) |
574g (18.5 oz.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the EOS RP are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Canon are the larger sensitivity and the lower weight than the OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The EOS RP scores 20 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
||
|
EOS RP |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 5 | 15 |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 4 | 80 |
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 250 | 440 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II are that the camera is faster, the larger selection of lenses and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is the superior video recording, that the battery has more stamina and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. Yields 17 points for the OM-D E-M1 Mark II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
EOS RP |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Sensor resolution (MP) | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| Similar size | 788cm³ | 840cm³ |
| WiFi | ||
| Canon EOS RP VS Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the EOS RP and OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon EOS RP |
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
20
|
17
|
|
We advise to choose the newest model: Canon EOS RP. |
|