Canon Ixus 190 vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Compare

Posted on by

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

Ixus 190 vs DMC FZ2000 - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Canon Ixus 190 vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Specs

Ixus 190

  • Introduced in January 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 20 megapixel
  • 1 frames/second
  • 100 – 1600 ISO
  • 1280 x 720 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 68.00mm (2.7″) Monitor
  • Zoom 24-240mm (10x), f3.0-6.9
  • WiFi built-in
  • 95.2 x 56.8 x 23.6mm³ (3.7″ x 2.2″ x 0.9″)
  • 137g (4.4 oz.)

All specs: Main page for Ixus 190

DMC FZ2000

  • Introduced in September 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1″
  • 20 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 125 – 12800 ISO
  • 4096 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 24-480mm (20x), f2.8-4.5
  • WiFi built-in
  • 137.6 x 101.9 x 134.7mm³ (5.4″ x 4.0″ x 5.3″)
  • 966g (31.2 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ2000

Ixus 190 vs DMC FZ2000: The sensors

The Ixus 190 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ2000 uses a 1″ sensor.

Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ2000’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Ixus 190 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips.

Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ2000

Canon Ixus 190 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Other Specs Comparison

Why is Canon Ixus 190 a better choice

Ixus 190

DMC FZ2000
Weighs less (2)

137g
(4.4 oz.)		 966g
(31.2 oz.)
More portable (2)

128cm³
(8 cu.in.)		 1889cm³
(119 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the Ixus 190 are the lower weight than the DMC FZ2000 and the more compact size.

The Ixus 190 scores 4 points.

Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ2000

Ixus 190

DMC FZ2000
Larger sensor (5)

Compact 1″
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)

20.00 20.10
Higher speed (4, frames/second)

1 12
Auto Focus points (4)

9 49
Better sensibility (4)

100 – 1600 ISO 125 – 12800 ISO
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)

0.23 1.04
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)

1280 x 720 4096 x 2160
External microphone (2)
Longer battery life (3, photos)

190 350

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ2000 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the larger sensitivity and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the articulated display, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DMC FZ2000 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina.

Yields 35 points for the DMC FZ2000.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

Ixus 190

DMC FZ2000
Built-in flash
Image stabilizer
WiFi
Canon Ixus 190 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Dimensions

Look at front view of the Ixus 190 and DMC FZ2000

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Canon Ixus 190

Panasonic DMC FZ2000

4
35

We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ2000 as better choice.