Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Enthusiast Compact cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mk. II vs Ricoh GR III: Specifications at a glance |
|
|
PowerShot G7 X Mk. II
All specs: Main page for PowerShot G7 X Mk. II |
GR III
All specs: Main page for GR III |
|
PowerShot G7 X Mk. II vs GR III: The sensors |
|
|
The PowerShot G7 X Mk. II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the GR III uses a APS-C sensor. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter. Featuring an area of 372mm² (0.60 sq.in.), the GR III’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the PowerShot G7 X Mk. II employs at 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with 1″ sized chips. Better choice: Ricoh GR III |
|
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mk. II VS Ricoh GR III Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon PowerShot G7 X Mk. II a better choice |
||
|
PowerShot G7 X Mk. II |
GR III |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 8 | 4 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 31 | 9 |
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 240 | 200 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mk. II are that the camera is faster, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the built-in flash. A nice touch is the articulated display and that the battery has more stamina. The PowerShot G7 X Mk. II scores 15 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Ricoh GR III |
||
|
PowerShot G7 X Mk. II |
GR III |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | APS-C |
| Sensor cleaning (3) | ||
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 24.00 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 125 – 12800 ISO | 100 – 102400 ISO |
| Weighs less (2) | 319g (10.3 oz.) |
257g (8.3 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 270cm³ (17 cu.in.) |
225cm³ (14 cu.in.) |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the GR III are the larger sensor, built-in automatic sensor cleaning and the higher resolution. Additional pros for the Ricoh are the larger sensitivity, the lower weight than the PowerShot G7 X Mk. II and the more compact size. Finally, there’s the the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. Yields 23 points for the GR III. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
PowerShot G7 X Mk. II |
GR III |
|
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Sensor resolution (MP) | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| Touch screen | ||
| Video resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| WiFi | ||
| Canon PowerShot G7 X Mk. II VS Ricoh GR III Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the PowerShot G7 X Mk. II and GR III |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mk. II |
Ricoh GR III |
|
15
|
23
|
|
We recommend Ricoh GR III as better choice. |
|