Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Canon PowerShot SX70 HS vs Panasonic DC TZ202 Specs |
|
|
PowerShot SX70 HS
All specs: Main page for PowerShot SX70 HS |
DC TZ202
All specs: Main page for DC TZ202 |
|
PowerShot SX70 HS vs DC TZ202: The sensors |
|
|
PowerShot SX70 HS features a Compact sized sensor, while the DC TZ202 uses a 1″ sensor. Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DC TZ202’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the PowerShot SX70 HS employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips. Better choice: Panasonic DC TZ202 |
|
PowerShot SX70 HS vs DC TZ202: Viewfinder PowerShot SX70 HS has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.39 megapixel with magnification of 0.50x. The DC TZ202 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.33 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.53x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
PowerShot SX70 HS (0.50x) |
DC TZ202 (0.53x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DC TZ202 |
||
|
Canon PowerShot SX70 HS VS Panasonic DC TZ202 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Canon PowerShot SX70 HS a better choice |
||
|
PowerShot SX70 HS |
DC TZ202 |
|
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.30 | 20.10 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.39 | 2.33 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot SX70 HS are the higher resolution, the better viewfinder and the articulated display. The PowerShot SX70 HS scores 11 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DC TZ202 |
||
|
PowerShot SX70 HS |
DC TZ202 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Compact | 1″ |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 9 | 49 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 3200 ISO | 80 – 25600 ISO |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 0.92 | 1.04 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 325 | 370 |
| Weighs less (2) | 608g (19.6 oz.) |
340g (11.0 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1346cm³ (85 cu.in.) |
334cm³ (21 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DC TZ202 are the larger sensor, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the larger sensitivity. We also like that the display has a higher resolution, the rather comfortable touch screen and that the battery has more stamina. Another advantage over the PowerShot SX70 HS: the lower weight than the PowerShot SX70 HS and the more compact size. Yields 24 points for the DC TZ202. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
PowerShot SX70 HS |
DC TZ202 |
|
| Speed (frames/second) | 10 | 10 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Video resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| WiFi | ||
| Canon PowerShot SX70 HS VS Panasonic DC TZ202 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the PowerShot SX70 HS and DC TZ202 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Canon PowerShot SX70 HS |
Panasonic DC TZ202 |
|
11
|
24
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DC TZ202 as better choice. |
|