Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Fujifilm X-T30 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Specs |
|
|
X-T30
All specs: Main page for X-T30 |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
All specs: Main page for OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
X-T30 vs OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Advantage: Fujifilm X-T30 |
|
X-T30 vs OM-D E-M1 Mark II: Viewfinder X-T30 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.62x. OM-D E-M1 Mark II has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
X-T30 (0.62x) |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II (0.74x) |
|
|
Note: Differences in the image area are the result of different image ratios, 3:2 or 4:3. That can make it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras. However, with these two cameras the difference is considerable in any case. |
||
|
Fujifilm X-T30 VS Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Fujifilm X-T30 a better choice |
||
|
X-T30 |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 26.10 | 20.30 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 425 | 121 |
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Weighs less (2) | 383g (12.4 oz.) |
574g (18.5 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 459cm³ (29 cu.in.) |
840cm³ (53 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the X-T30 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the built-in flash, the lower weight than the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the more compact size. The X-T30 scores 20 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
||
|
X-T30 |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 8 | 15 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 200 – 12800 ISO | 200 – 25600 ISO |
| Larger lens selection (3) | 25 | 80 |
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 380 | 440 |
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
| Environmental sealing (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II are that the camera is faster, the larger sensitivity and the larger selection of lenses. We also like the optical image stabilizer, the superior video recording and that the battery has more stamina. Another advantage over the X-T30: the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. Yields 21 points for the OM-D E-M1 Mark II. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
X-T30 |
OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
| Sensor cleaning | ||
| Sensor resolution (MP) | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| Articulated screen | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Fujifilm X-T30 VS Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the X-T30 and OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Fujifilm X-T30 |
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
|
20
|
21
|
|
We advise to choose the newest model: Fujifilm X-T30. |
|