Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Leica C-Lux vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Specs |
|
|
C-Lux
All specs: Main page for C-Lux |
DMC FZ2000
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ2000 |
|
C-Lux vs DMC FZ2000 Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:
Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter. 1″ sensor built into both cameras has a total area of about 116mm² (4.6 sq.in.). |
|
C-Lux vs DMC FZ2000: Viewfinder C-Lux has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.33 megapixel with magnification of 0.53x. The DMC FZ2000 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
C-Lux (0.53x) |
DMC FZ2000 (0.74x) |
|
|
Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
||
|
Leica C-Lux VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Leica C-Lux a better choice |
||
|
C-Lux |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 25600 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 370 | 350 |
| Weighs less (2) | 340g (11.0 oz.) |
966g (31.2 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 334cm³ (21 cu.in.) |
1889cm³ (119 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the C-Lux are the larger sensitivity, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the DMC FZ2000. Another advantage over the DMC FZ2000: the more compact size. The C-Lux scores 11 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
||
|
C-Lux |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 12 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.33 | 2.36 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ2000 are that the camera is faster, the better viewfinder and the articulated display. A recommendation of the DMC FZ2000 is made easy by the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone. Yields 14 points for the DMC FZ2000. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
C-Lux |
DMC FZ2000 |
|
| Sensor format | 1″ | 1″ |
| Resolution (megapixel) | 20.10 | 20.10 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Sensor resolution (MP) | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| Touch screen | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Leica C-Lux VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the C-Lux and DMC FZ2000 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Leica C-Lux |
Panasonic DMC FZ2000 |
|
11
|
14
|
|
We advise to choose the newest model: Leica C-Lux. |
|