Leica C-Lux vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

C-Lux vs DMC FZ2000 - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Leica C-Lux vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Specs


  • Introduced in June 2018
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1″
  • 20 megapixel
  • 10 frames/second
  • 80 – 25600 ISO
  • 3840 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor
  • Zoom 24-360mm (15x), f3.3-6.4
  • WiFi built-in
  • 111.2 x 66.4 x 45.2mm³ (4.4″ x 2.6″ x 1.8″)
  • 340g (11.0 oz.)

All specs: Main page for C-Lux

DMC FZ2000

  • Introduced in September 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1″
  • 20 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 125 – 12800 ISO
  • 4096 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0″) Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 24-480mm (20x), f2.8-4.5
  • WiFi built-in
  • 137.6 x 101.9 x 134.7mm³ (5.4″ x 4.0″ x 5.3″)
  • 966g (31.2 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ2000

C-Lux vs DMC FZ2000 Sensors

On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:

Info graphic: C-Lux an DMC FZ2000 sensor comparison

Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter.

1″ sensor built into both cameras has a total area of about 116mm² (4.6 sq.in.).

C-Lux vs DMC FZ2000: Viewfinder

C-Lux has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.33 megapixel with magnification of 0.53x.

The DMC FZ2000 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.74x.

Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x.

C-Lux (0.53x)

DMC FZ2000 (0.74x)

Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ2000

Leica C-Lux VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Other Specs Comparison

Why is Leica C-Lux a better choice


DMC FZ2000

Better sensibility (4)

80 – 25600 ISO 125 – 12800 ISO
Longer battery life (3, photos)

370 350
Weighs less (2)

(11.0 oz.)
(31.2 oz.)
More portable (2)

(21 cu.in.)
(119 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the C-Lux are the larger sensitivity, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the DMC FZ2000. Another advantage over the DMC FZ2000: the more compact size.

The C-Lux scores 11 points.

Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ2000


DMC FZ2000

Higher speed (4, frames/second)

10 12
Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel)

2.33 2.36
Articulated monitor (2)

Better Video (2)

3840 x 2160 4096 x 2160
External microphone (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ2000 are that the camera is faster, the better viewfinder and the articulated display. A recommendation of the DMC FZ2000 is made easy by the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone.

Yields 14 points for the DMC FZ2000.

Common Specs for both cameras compared


DMC FZ2000

Sensor format

1″ 1″
Resolution (megapixel)

20.10 20.10
Built-in flash

Image stabilizer

Sensor resolution (MP)

1.04 1.04
Touch screen


Leica C-Lux VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Dimensions

Look at front view of the C-Lux and DMC FZ2000

Top view of cameras

Total scores

Here’s the total score according to comparison above:

Leica C-Lux

Panasonic DMC FZ2000


We advise to choose the newest model: Leica C-Lux.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments