Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Enthusiast Compact cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
Leica Q-P vs Fujifilm X30 Specs |
|
Q-P
All specs: Main page for Q-P |
X30
All specs: Main page for X30 |
Q-P vs X30: The sensors |
|
Q-P features a Full frame sized sensor, while the X30 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 864mm² (1.38 sq.in.) the sensor of the Q-P is a lot larger than the X30’s chip at 58mm² (0.09 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Leica Q-P |
Q-P vs X30: Viewfinder Q-P has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 3.68 megapixel with magnification of 0.70x. The X30 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.65x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
Q-P (0.70x) |
X30 (0.65x) |
|
Advantage: Leica Q-P |
Leica Q-P VS Fujifilm X30 Other Specs Comparison |
Why is Leica Q-P a better choice |
||
Q-P |
X30 |
|
Larger sensor (5) | Full frame | Compact |
Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 24.20 | 12.00 |
Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 50000 ISO | 100 – 12800 ISO |
Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 3.68 | 2.36 |
Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 0.92 |
Touch screen (2) | ||
WiFi (2) | ||
Conclusion: Advantages of the Q-P are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the larger sensitivity. We also like the better viewfinder, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the Q-P is made easy by the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. The Q-P scores 24 points. |
||
Otherwise why to choose Fujifilm X30 |
||
Q-P |
X30 |
|
Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 12 |
Built-in flash (2) | ||
Image stabilizer (3) | ||
Articulated monitor (2) | ||
Longer battery life (3, photos) | 300 | 470 |
Weighs less (2) | 640g (20.6 oz.) |
423g (13.6 oz.) |
More portable (2) | 967cm³ (61 cu.in.) |
512cm³ (32 cu.in.) |
Conclusion: Advantages of the X30 are that the camera is faster, the built-in flash and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is the articulated display, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the Q-P. Another advantage over the Q-P: the more compact size. Yields 18 points for the X30. |
||
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
Q-P |
X30 |
|
Video resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Leica Q-P VS Fujifilm X30 Dimensions |
Look at front view of the Q-P and X30 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
Leica Q-P |
Fujifilm X30 |
24
|
18
|
We recommend Leica Q-P as better choice. |