Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Enthusiast Compact cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Leica Q-P vs Sony Cyber-shot RX100 III Specs |
|
|
Q-P
All specs: Main page for Q-P |
Cyber-shot RX100 III
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot RX100 III |
|
Q-P vs Cyber-shot RX100 III Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter. Boasting an area of 864mm² (1.38 sq.in.) the sensor of the Q-P is a lot larger than the Cyber-shot RX100 III’s chip at 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (e.g. interior images), a clear disadvantage of the 1″ format. Better choice: Leica Q-P |
|
Q-P vs Cyber-shot RX100 III: Viewfinder Q-P has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 3.68 megapixel with magnification of 0.70x. Cyber-shot RX100 III has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 1.44 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.59x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
Q-P (0.70x) |
Cyber-shot RX100 III (0.59x) |
|
|
Advantage: Leica Q-P |
||
|
Leica Q-P VS Sony Cyber-shot RX100 III Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Leica Q-P a better choice |
||
|
Q-P |
Cyber-shot RX100 III |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | Full frame | 1″ |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 24.20 | 20.10 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 25 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 100 – 50000 ISO | 125 – 12800 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 3.68 | 1.44 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Q-P are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Leica are the larger sensitivity, the better viewfinder and the rather comfortable touch screen. The Q-P scores 24 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot RX100 III |
||
|
Q-P |
Cyber-shot RX100 III |
|
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Image stabilizer (3) | ||
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 1.20 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 300 | 320 |
| Weighs less (2) | 640g (20.6 oz.) |
280g (9.0 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 967cm³ (61 cu.in.) |
242cm³ (15 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot RX100 III are the built-in flash, the optical image stabilizer and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the articulated display, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the Q-P. Another advantage over the Q-P: the more compact size. Yields 16 points for the Cyber-shot RX100 III. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
Q-P |
Cyber-shot RX100 III |
|
| Speed (frames/second) | 10 | 10 |
| Video resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| WiFi | ||
| Leica Q-P VS Sony Cyber-shot RX100 III Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the Q-P and Cyber-shot RX100 III |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Leica Q-P |
Sony Cyber-shot RX100 III |
|
24
|
16
|
|
We recommend Leica Q-P as better choice. |
|