Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Panasonic DMC FZ200 Specs |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
DMC FZ200
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ200 |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs DMC FZ200: The sensors |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the DMC FZ200 uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC FZ1000 II is a lot larger than the DMC FZ200’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs DMC FZ200: Viewfinder DMC FZ1000 II has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 2.36 megapixel with magnification of 0.74x. The DMC FZ200 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 1.30 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.50x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II (0.74x) |
DMC FZ200 (0.50x) |
|
|
Advantage: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
||
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Panasonic DMC FZ200 Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
DMC FZ200 |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 12.00 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 23 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 125 – 12800 ISO | 100 – 3200 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 2.36 | 1.30 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.24 | 0.46 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| WiFi (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, the better viewfinder and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. The DMC FZ1000 II scores 30 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ200 |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
DMC FZ200 |
|
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 440 | 500 |
| Weighs less (2) | 810g (26.1 oz.) |
588g (19.0 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
1195cm³ (75 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ200 are that the battery has more stamina, the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size. Yields 7 points for the DMC FZ200. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
DMC FZ200 |
|
| Speed (frames/second) | 12 | 12 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Articulated screen | ||
| External microphone | ||
| Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Panasonic DMC FZ200 Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and DMC FZ200 |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
Panasonic DMC FZ200 |
|
30
|
7
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|